Thursday, December 10, 2009

December Blog #4: The Shining, by Stephen King, published 1980

I don't usually do horror books. Or movies for that matter. I'm kind of faint of heart, but I've made exceptions in the past, particularly regarding movies.

A couple of years ago, my friends and I had a movie night, in which we stayed up all night watching horror movies. These movies practically forced us to stay up anyway, so I wasn't quite as sleepy as one might think. Directly after finishing Alien (awesome movie, by the way, some cool symbolism and disturbing imagery), we popped in the Shining, to be greeted by perhaps my favorite horror movie of all time.

And now, I've gotten around to starting the novel.

And it starts off quite slow. I suppose this shouldn't come as a surprise, because so did the movie, but it caught me off guard, because very little has happened so far.

Suspense building? Maybe a little. I can draw connections between King's self-proclaimed alcoholism, and the alcoholism of the main character Jack. Maybe as I continue this book, I'll draw a few more.

December Blog #3: The Tao of Pooh, by Benjamin Holt, published 1982

I am now finishing up the Tao of Pooh, which will sit upon the shelf of my fave books for a long time to come, I do believe. I am currently doing the Tao, as Ms. Embry would say.

I've learned a lot. I've learned of the Uncarved Block, of which Pooh is undoubtedly a great example. Not the greatest. Greatest isn't much of a Taoist idea.

The basic idea of the Uncarved Block is that things reach their most beautiful state when they reach their simplest. I've used the words simple a lot when talking about Taoism, and that may be a slightly underwhelming term. It also probably doesn't capture the essence of Taoism. Let's see, if I had to choose one word to describe Taoism, it would probably have to be acceptance. I guess.

Let me use the Tao of Pooh to help illustrate, using the example of an old painting called "The Vinegar Tasters." In the painting, 3 men are tasting vinegar from a bowl. The first man, Confucius, has a sour expression, for this vinegar is unsuitable. The second person, Buddha, carries a bitter expression. You see, he would much rather taste some vinegar from the spiritual realms. That vinegar would be much better.

But the last person, Lao Tse, is smiling. He accepts the vinegar for what it is. The vinegar can't do any better, right?

Mind blowing, for me at least.

December Blog #2: The Tao of Pooh, by Benjamin Holt, published 1982

Last year, in my 10th grade AP World History class, we read an excerpt from this delightful little book, and it blew my mind.

I've always been a big fan of simpler things, a less is more type of approach. When I play guitar, I have a minimalist approach that focuses on lots of cool little tricks, rather than playing particularly fast. When I write essays, I eschew words like eschew in favor of words that people tend to use in everyday conversation. When I write poetry and stories, I don't use incredible complex rhyme schemes or humongous plot twists, because sometimes the deepest, most complex, and most downright gorgeous things come from simple words.

What does that have to with anything? Well, the Taoist principles promote simplicity and acceptance above all else. And that is exactly why Pooh works as a symbol of Taoism at it's core. Who else could possibly create a conversation as accepting and simple as the following?

"Or how about Li Pooh, the famous Taoist poet?" Pooh asked cautiosly.
"You mean Li Po." [William Holt] said.
"Oh."

'Oh.' Simple as that. If you haven't noticed, I once strongly considered conversion to Taoism.

December Blog #1: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams, Published 1979

Oh, how the tides have changed.

What began as a chuckle-filled sci-fi romp quickly deteriorated into a mess of fart jokes. I understand that The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is considered a classic, but I suppose the humor's just not for me.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy this style of humor, usually. But something about this novel kind of grinds my gears. Is it the incessantly pompous humor? I sometimes get the feeling that Douglas Adams thinks he's quite a bit cleverer than he should. Not to say that he's not a clever guy, because quite a few of the jokes are pretty funny. But there can only be so clever, and Adams comes across as thinking he has crossed that boundary.

I hate to be a negative and overly critical person, but I humbly have to put down the Hitchhiker's Guide. I haven't even passed the halfway mark. I hate it too, because my Dad loves it, and everyone I know lauds heaps of praise on it (tautology, anyone? Lauds praise?).

I'll end it with this. I get the idea, and the appeal. Just not for me.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

November Blog #8: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams, Published 1979

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: First Impressions

Having only read the first few chapters of the Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy, I can't cast a final judgment on the novel, but what I have read is very British, and conversely very witty. It also sports a lot of references to popular culture, such as when Ford throws away his copy of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Gotta love that name.

There is also a pretty funny shout out the soccer team the Arsenal, who I could honestly live without (go Liverpool!), and lots of digital watches. Adams' style is very tongue in cheek, quite hysterical.

My only problem with Hitchhiker's is it's inherent "Britishness." Don't get me wrong, Hitchhiker's is quite funny, but after seeing Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, and watching the UK version of The Office (which is hysterical), they all sort of meld together.

November Blog #7: The Life of Pi, by Yann Martel, Published 2001

Wacky it gets, then. A floating, acidic, predatory island made entirely of algae? Check. An ending that presents an entirely different take on the entire story? Check. A layered look at atheism, agnosticism, and faith? Check.

The Life of Pi captures the readers thoughts, bottles them, and gives you one of three choices. Or something like that.

Early in the book, Pi gives his thoughts on Agnosticism, and explains that those who do not choose are lost. They have nothing. Then, at the end, Pi presents two stories, and lets you decide which one is better.

So what exactly is the point Martel trying to make? Is he stressing that the more fascinating story is just that, a story, and yet the one the masses will accept? Is he showing you the beauty of the unknown? Whatever the case, Martel makes it obvious that if you refuse to accept either story, you are missing out on both the beauty and the logical, leaving you with next to nothing.

Is that the point he is trying to make?

November Blog #6: The Life of Pi, by Yann Martel, Published 2001

"I have a story that will make you believe in God." -Author's Note

As unlikely as that may be, The Life of Pi is an enchanting story, at least to this point. Pi describes his life in India, which all comes across as rather boring and ordinary. He begins comparing zoology with religion in an unnaturally sophisticated matter for someone so young, and then his Dad decides to move the zoo (oh yeah, his Dad owns a zoo).

Unfortunately, the boat sinks, and that's when Pi is forced to share a boat with Richard Parker, a tiger. And the book gets even better.

There is a lot of symbolism in this novel, and a lot of rather beautiful descriptions. I can't decide if this book is a tad too preachy for me or not, but it certainly is enjoyable. My Mom told me it gets a little wacked out towards the end, and has a bunch of religious references.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

November Blog #5: Fight Club, by Chuck Pahlaniuk, Published 1996

I have just completed Fight Club.

Fight Club is the sort of novel that sticks with you, especially if you're a guy. I mean, the entire story seems to be based around the narrator struggling with his own masculinity, alternately doing absolutely bonkers things and then trying to keep himself in check.

The final chapter lends some powerful finality (no pun intended) to the story. The narrator finally got what he wanted, which was to be remembered, and it wasn't necessarily for all the bad things either. Though committing suicide can be a bit cliche.

I'd have to say Fight Club has sneaked it's way into my top 5 favorite books now. It really possesses a feeling of spiritual journey and abstract mysticism that drags you in, and refuses to let you go.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

November Blog #4: Fight Club, by Chuck Pahlaniuk, Published 1996

So, wait a second, the narrator is Tyler? Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?!! Didn't see that bit of information coming!

It does make sense, though. Where did Tyler go during the day? Why did he disappear whenever anyone else was around? Because he's just a part of the narrator's personality. And the narrator is Tyler. Tyler is the narrators best friend. He is his own best friend.

This revelation grants the book a new poignancy. So, in the opening scene, he's attempting to commit suicide? And he is really having sex with Marla, and isn't too happy about it?

This book is weird.

The narrator (for he is "the narrator" and not Tyler. Tyler is a worse part of him) has struggled with his own individuality up to this point because he doesn't really know who he is. He didn't even recognize that he was Tyler. I like this book. Solomon read more.

November Blog #3: Fight Club, by Chuck Pahlaniuk, Published 1996

Fight Club is an introspective look into the psych of a man struggling with his masculinity. Around every corner waits something out to get him, or something that reminds him of his insecurity as a man. He was raised by a mother, we are told. He mentions his father creating a new dynasty every six years with a sort of reverence.

This book is weird.

I like it. Fight Club is pretty daggum awesome. It is at once poetic and gritty. I still have a lot more to read, but I now actually know what the "Fight Club" is! It is a chance for the narrator kick some serious butt and release his masculinity (that sounds kind of gross... this book is starting to get to me). He deals with his issues by kicking his issues in the face.

Manly.

November Blog #2: Fight Club, by Chuck Palahniuk, published 1996

Fight Club is a strange and fascinating novel, though I'm only on page 30 or so.

Gosh, this can seem difficult to write about. Palahniuk writes in a choppy fashion, often going on tangents. Fight Club also remains rather depressing.

What is Palahniuk talking about? Why so much sexual imagery? I have a hunch that the sexual imagery is there to spark discomfort and sexual tension. The narrator (who is nameless, I guess?) does not seem to enjoy Marla's company much, and dislikes her more when she is having sex with Tyler. Yikes.

This is certainly a mature and very strange book. I look forward to more.

November Blog #1: Dave Barry Talks Back, by Dave Barry, Published 1991

Maybe I'm not "stretching my wings" so much now, but I had to read another Dave Barry collection. He is ridiculously funny.

Talks Back covers a wide range of topics given by Barry's readers, from Disney World to exploding animals. In fact, the first 5 or so chapters are devoted to cases of exploding animals, and safety tips regarding them.

Not exactly everyday stuff, right?

It's everyday stuff for Dave, apparently. In fact, he takes such situations wholeheartedly, with open arms. Dave Barry slaps a goofy grin on your face.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

October Blog #7: Dreams From My Father, by Barack Obama, published 1995

Interesting note, the book was published in 1995, but re-published in 2004, when it began to catch some steam. I have the 2004 version. Just throwing that out there.

What would you expect from a memoir by a politician? Is it a lyrical and incredibly well written piece reminiscent of The House on Mango Street? Probably not, but that's what we have here.

I am not a huge fan of Obama. His campaign strategies remind me far too much of the campaign strategies Bush used (and I absolutely loved Bush, what a great president. He wasn't a tool, or anything), and that doesn't ring well with me.

So what. This is a good book.

I've read biographies. Too many, if you ask me, many of them can be quite boring. But Dreams From My Father is evocative from start to finish. Some of the story he tells has already been heard, maybe many times before, but those stories were probably not told as well as they are here.

Here, Obama is just showing off. And I think that's kind of cool.

October Blog #6: Dave Barry's Greatest Hits, by Dave Barry, published 1988

On to another collection of essays. In fact, these are Dave Barry's best!

Obviously, I haven't finished the book, considering I just got it from you today. I'm on about page 60, and I think I find him to be more entertaining than Sedaris, at least so far.

Not much has happened. He's buying a house right now, and being funny about it. Barry also seems to really enjoy Miami. Or maybe he's kidding, I don't know. He's also talking a lot about taxes. Yay for politics!

Which brings me to my next, and completely off topic, point. I absolutely detest politics, and Barry is only making me think more about the daggum politicians! Curse you for being so entertaining Barry!

October Blog #5: When You Are Engulfed in Flames, by David Sedaris, published 2008

David Sedaris is a pretty funny guy, and When You are Engulfed in Flames is a funny book. But what makes WYaEiF such a fun book is the variety in story telling and some surprisingly touching essays (though these tend to be a bit strange as well).

Sedaris's writing is autobiographical in nature. His topics tend to be a tad random, his writing and tone whimsical, and his jokes can be both intelligent and silly.

Whether he's writing about lancing boils or a New York cab driver who won't shut up about his sex life, Sedaris makes for a fun read.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

October Blog #4: Hoot, by Carl Hiaasen, published 2002

Did the owls live? Yes.

Was anyone surprised? No.

Then why, oh why, is this book such a fun read? Because it is such a novel novel (see what I did there?). The plot behind Hoot is different and fun. I don't know of any novels (save Hiaasen's similar novel Flush) that has a story as innocent and (strangely) gripping as the one told here. It really is beautiful, in a way.

Speaking of Flush, however, makes this book lose a little magic. Having already read Flush, I can tell you that the two are very, very similar, though Hoot is definitely the better of the two. In any case, Hoot is definitely worth the read and highly recommended.

October Blog #3: Hoot, by Carl Hiaasen, published 2002

A hippie book if I've ever seen one!

Hoot is all about saving owls. That's right. And it's pretty dang good considering it's a book about saving owls. Scratch that, it's a great book period.

Hoot is beautifully paced, it's one of those books you just can't put down. In fact, I'm blowing through it right now! If there is one thing wrong with this book, however, it's that the characters are a little stale. Roy is a kind of stereotypical protagonist. "Mullet Fingers" is kind of cool though, I guess.

Will the burrowing owls die a gruesome death at the hands of the bulldozer (of course not, this is a children's book...)? Will Roy ever see the bulldozing company put to rest? Stay tuned in next time on "Hoot: Live or Let Die"!

Thursday, October 8, 2009

October Blog #2: A Briefer History of Time, by Stephen Hawking, published 2005

I have (finally) completed this book.

Though I thoroughly enjoyed the novel, it was almost like reading a more entertaining and more concise physics textbook. There is only so much you can take at a time!

I also found Hawking had a sharp wit, and I kind of wish he put it to use a little bit more. The sparseness made it stand out more, I guess.

Hawking is a genius. A modern Einstein. What makes him all the more incredible and inspiring is the sickness he has been battling for more than a decade, which is much longer than the average ALS patient.

Hawking, you're the man.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

October Blog #1: A Briefer History of Time, by Stephen Hawking, published 2005

I never thought I would ever enjoy reading about the theory of relativity. Is it possible? Stephen Hawking thinks so.

Hawking makes the insane sensible with a bluntness that can only come from someone who knows he is slightly more intelligent than the average person. And by slightly more intelligent, I mean a lot more intelligent.

I personally have never stopped to think about how my perception of a ping pong ball on a train is entirely different from the person hitting the ping pong ball. If this is a somewhat stripped down version of "A Brief History of Time," then I dread to think how tedious that book might be.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

September Blog #7: The Truth (With Jokes), by Al Franken, published 2005

In a break from the elevated sciences of A Briefer History of Time, I have moved on to another information-heavy but considerably more light-hearted body of text.

Al Franken is a funny dude. I don't always agree with him on his political points, but The Truth isn't here to push liberal views, it is to revoke the campaign tactics of the Republican party, and some of their social views as well. And, let's face it, the people at the top of the Republican party as of now aren't coming across as particularly intelligent. In fact, they are coming across as Lying Liars who happen to tell a lot of Lies. (I sincerely apologize if you disagree with me).

The only issue I find with this book is Al can be a little offensive sometimes. However, I've always thought that if you can't deal with a little cursing and slurring, you might need to grow up a little bit.

September Blog #6: A Briefer History of Time, by Stephen Hawking, published 2005

Did I say I wanted to read some heavier stuff? I got heavier stuff.

Not too heavy, mind you, that is part of the beauty of this book. But Hawking's talk of theories and how partial theories do not necessarily relate to one another and will not necessarily create a universal truth is a bit deeper.

It's a bit funny that immediately after Hawking explains that a universal theory may or may not dictate our human nature, and it may be impossible for us to ever truly understand such a thing because we may not be rational beings, he falls back on Darwin's theory of natural selection to back himself up. What a mouthful.

September Blog #5: A Briefer History of Time, by Stephen Hawking, published 2005

Current Chapter: 3

How does one even begin to fathom the secrets of our universe? Who holds the key?

The answer, my friends, is not blowing in the wind. Past philosophers such as Aristotle and Ptolemy began a rather difficult job, and Stephen Hawking is doing his best to finish it.

A Briefer History of time is (so far) an incredibly accessible book. Hawking, one of the greatest minds of our time, has condensed the progression of our understanding of the universe into two chapters in a book. That alone says something.

Now, I'm not going to say I haven't learned anything, but I am looking forward to some of the heavier stuff, because I've already read a great deal about Ptolemy. Nerd alert!

Friday, September 11, 2009

September Blog #4: The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, published 1948

Quite the morbid story, don't you think?

If you have not read The Lottery, I highly recommend it. It is now one of my favorite short stories I have read.

Considering the time it was written, one can only imagine the sort of uproar a story like this created. Actually, I typed the story into google to learn a little more about it, and read about the uproar it created. Hooray for advances in modern science.

But, on to the story. A happy gathering of people, where people happily wait for someone to be chosen to die. It is a lottery, about as fair as it gets when it comes to chances. But it is not fair once someone has been called upon.

There are a lot of themes running around in this story, but I think that the driving theme is how human nature is unfair, and also disrespectful.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

September Blog #2: "Zombie Ants Controlled by Fungus," by LiveScience, published 2009

A fascinating article I read fairly recently.

Apparently, fungi in South America land on an ant, and then direct them to the spot ideal for the ant to die and fungus to live and reproduce. The ant then clamps it's mandibles down on the spot.

This is where it gets really interesting. Next, the fungus explodes out of the back of the ants head. Yikes!

Kind of creepy, no? I think so. The implications are extraordinary, yet scientists have no idea how the fungus controls the ant so precisely. Scientists are still observing the interaction between ants and fungus (don't imagine it would be too hard, what with fungi three times the size of the ant wobbling on it's head), but have yet to make a break through.

September Blog #2: Selected Essays, by Ralph Emerson, published 1882

You know what might be the most irritating thing about the Transcendentalists? How quick they are to believe in the good of others. Do you know why that is annoying? Because everyone (including myself) wants that to be true.

But the HUMAN EXPERIENCE dictates that that is not so. Excuse me, but there are awful people out there. Is Hitler a good person at his core? Perhaps, but does that matter, in the big scheme of things? No, probably not. He was crazy, and he believed in things just as far-fetched sounding as many of the things Emerson and many others believe (I'm talking more than just transcendentalists).

I don't mean to compare Emerson to Hitler or Hussein. I mean to use those people to challenge Emerson's beliefs.

As a side note, it's kind of weird that Emerson ended Selected Essays with a surprisingly touching essay on Thoreau.

September Blog #1: Selected Essays, by Ralph Emerson, published 1882

Why, oh why, did I start reading this?

I think I should've known that I had had enough of the transcendentalists. They're crazy. Maybe that's harsh. Maybe that's not.

But reading the essay titled "The Over-Soul" leaves me of the opinion that it is a little harsh. While I tend to agree with some of Emerson's views, I do not agree with them to the extent that he would believe them (most of the time).

For example, I agree with his belief that religion is a personal thing, and not something that is a "sweet envelope" with which to cover the people. However, Emerson is a tad more hypocritical than I am (or at least, I like to think so). He believes that only through his methods may one achieve total humility in the face of God. How can religion be so vulgar and overbearing if he claims his way is the only way?

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

August Blog #5: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, by J.K. Rowling, published 2007

Wow, I blew through that book!

And I was right! Snape was a good guy after all. I think. At the very least, he certainly enjoyed Lily's company. Speaking of which, did you notice how, just before Snape dies, he asks for Harry to look at him so he can see his eyes, which are just like Lily's? Awww, isn't that sweet!

In conclusion, though, I would say that the Deathly Hallows was a worthy finish to the series, though it got off to a very slow start. I suppose that is the custom of the Potter series, to finish with a bang, and this one certainly did.

This final novel was also packed to the brim with back stories, particularly Dumbledore's and Snape's, with a little bit of Harry's parents thrown in. I enjoyed this, because Snape is my favorite character, and Dumbledore is probably in the top 5.

Now that I mention it, I blew through that entire series. I'm certainly going to feel a bit of nostalgia, every time I see one.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

August Blog #4: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, by J. K. Rowling, published 2005

(Fin!)

I'm having trouble deciding whether this entry, or The Prisoner of Azkaban is my favorite book (so far, at least). I feel like The Half-Blood Prince is probably the better of the two.

The series has grown progressively darker with each novel, evolving from fairy tale-ish children's books to darker, more thought out fantasy novels. And The Half-Blood Prince is the latest next step.

Rowling (at least with the latest entries) has a habit of slowly building the story up, until it hits the climax in the last 100 or so pages, when things go haywire.

I feel like Snape will be a good guy, in the end. Or I'd like him to be, because he's pretty cool. Probably my favorite character, he's much more complex than the rest, it seems. Should I trust Snape, like Dumbledore did? Well, let's find out.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

August Blog #3: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, by J. K. Rowling, published 2005

(I'm about a third of the way through the book.)

And now we come to the sixth Harry Potter novel. The sixth film was my favorite by far (though, admittedly, that's not saying much), so I suppose this book has some shoes to fill. And I suppose that so far, the book has filled those shoes to the brim, and is now spilling slightly over the edge. Whatever that means.

I have grown to ignore Rowlings prolific use of adverbs in dialogue attribution. The books are very well written on the whole, and they continue to keep me guessing, which satisfies my inner mystery craving.

The best part of these novels, and in this one particular, it seems, is the strength of the characters. Dumbledore is pretty awesome, Malfoy has finally seemed to change at least a little bit, Hermione has gotten a lot less one-sided, and Snape has always been awesome. Unfortunatelly, having seen the film, I know perfectly well that Snape is the Half-Blood Prince, but the film did not explore his writing as well as the novel, and the picture of Snape that is being painted makes Snape a very interesting character.

Sunday, August 16, 2009

August Blog #2: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, by J. K. Rowling, published 2003

I have just completed the book.

Was Order of the Phoenix as good as the Goblet of Fire? No, probably not. And I didn't like it as much as the Prisoner of Azkaban either. But it was better than the first two novels, in my opinion, and that makes it pretty dang good.

Dumbledore is much cooler in OotP than he is in the other novels, in which he doesn't do much. Harry still hasn't changed that much, which is unfortunate. He has pretty much never wavered from the path of good. Malfoy is Malfoy, not necessarily a good thing, but I understand why he is in the novels.

Rowling is obviously a very good writer, but she NEVER stops using adverbs, especially in dialogue attribution. It's a little ridiculous. So many "Harry said menacingly"s and "Hermione roared imperiously"s, it's downright bonkers. Otherwise the series is very good, and I look forward to completing the series.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

August Blog #1: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, by J. K. Rowling, published 2003

Page: 383

I think the reason that I didn't read Harry Potter as a child was because I didn't like the movies. That, or I was just trying to be a nonconformist. I spent my elementary school years tackling The Lord of the Rings (because the movies are awesome), and believe me, that was not a fun reading experience at that age.

The Half-Blood Prince film won me over, it was pretty good, and the Harry Potter novels are very fun. Rowling has a fun voice, the story has fun characters (except for Malfoy, he's stayed exactly the same for all 5 novels so far), and Hogwarts is a fun setting. The novels really picked up once I started The Prisoner of Azkaban (the first two were too similar for my liking), and they haven't looked back.

The Order of the Phoenix has something to live up to, because I thought The Goblet of Fire was the best in the series so far (the movie was the worst one so far, however, which means it was pretty bad). The book is a little slow as of now, but the Goblet of Fire was slow as well, it just finished spectacularly. TOotP is also a more mature novel than the other ones, with darker undertones.

I can feel the story beginning to pick up, and look forward to continuing.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

May Blog #6: When Zachary Beaver Came to Town, by Kimberly Willis Holt, published 2001

Luckily, that was a short book. But it was actually really good.

Holt has crafted quite the tale here, and the story is certainly a tear jerker. I won't spoil too much, because I think you should read it, but the climax is great. One person dies, and the entire city breaks down.

Zachary Beaver is really easy to root for, too, and the final few pages of the book are incredibly descriptive and, strangely, have an "epic" feel to them. I highly recommend the book.

May Blog #5: When Zachary Beaver Came to Town, by Kimberly Willis Holt, published 2001

I hesitate to pick up a book like this, but my mom adored it and insisted (even more reason not to read it, but whatever). It seems like it would be just the kind of book this would be kind of sappy, but whatever.

One good thing is, it is a really easy read! I'm already at around page 100. Also, it is good. Really good, even. I feel bad for Zachary, who lives in a trailer all day because he is reportedly the fattest man in the world. And worse still, now he's been abandoned.

I feel a little strange saying this, but the story has certainly got a cute factor that has won me over. And, the writing is actually pretty good.

May Blog #4: Jurassic Park: The Lost World, by Michael Chrichton, published 1995

I have just completed the book.

It's been a while, but I don't recall enjoying the original Jurassic Park as much as I enjoyed this one. Perhaps it's because Chrichton got into the action much faster this time around.

Also, things came together as the book progressed. It becomes apparent as the book progresses that the dinosaurs on the island are all failed experiments and for that reason have strange habits and show heightened aggressiveness or the aforementioned chameleon-like color changing abilities.

It's a shame Chrichton is gone, because a third book would've been possible and probably could've been pretty cool.

May Blog #3: Jurassic Park: The Lost World, by Michael Chrichton, published 1995

I have just hit about the 5/6 part of the story, and a lot of questions are being answered.

I've got to hand it to Chrichton, the man does a decent job of applying fictional science and making something sound plausible. For example, his explanation for the barbaric nature of the velociraptors is interesting, and makes one think about the effects of placing technology in the hands of nature.

Sadly, Chrichton has a habit of putting entirely fictitious "facts" into these Jurassic Park stories. For example, there is no evidence a T-Rex could not see you if you don't move. And the carnosaurs in this story, for whatever reason, have chameleon like color changing abilities.

Monday, May 18, 2009

May Blog #2: Jurassic Park: The Lost World, by Micheal Chrichton, published 1995

Uncharacteristic of Chrichton novels, there were only about 50 pages of science heavy talk (probably because this is a sequel), as opposed to the usual 100 pages.

Anyway, the book is moving on nicely, and has a much quicker pace than the last book. Something in the back of my mind tells me that the book is not very good, but I am a sucker for dinosaurs, so I don't really notice.

There are some mysteries around this "second island" that are unsolved as of now, and I'm wondering what kind of crazy ideas Chrichton will pull out this time.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

May Blog #1: Jurassic Park: The Lost World, by Micheal Chrichton, published 1995

I used to be a big fan of Chrichton. I read quite a few of his novels, including Congo, the Andromeda Strain, Jurassic Park, and a few others. But I never got around to reading the Lost World.

So, here I am, flipping through the opening pages. Chrichton always seems to begin his books in this manner; the man takes his time pulling everything together. I imagine it would be difficult to just throw people on an island full of dinosaurs and expect people to believe it, but I'm on page 50, and the story is dense as it could be.

Fortunately, having been through this sort of thing with Chrichton before, I can safely assume the story will pick up soon, especially since the first Jurassic Park was as good as it was.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

April Blog #5: Ender's Shadow, by Orson Scott Card, published 1999

I have just completed Ender's Shadow, and yes it lived up to my rather lofty expectations.

One of the more compelling parts about this book is how much more Card developed the characters. Ender always had a personality, but everyone else seemed more like robots. Really smart robots.

But in Ender's Shadow, Card does a good job of making them all different people, even though Bean might as well be a robot. You feel for Ender as he begins to go crazy, and you can't stand Achilles any more than Bean can.

This novel, and it's parallel, are truly special books, and I would recommend them to anyone and everyone who enjoys any semblance of action or science fiction.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

April Blog #4: Ender's Shadow, by Orson Scott Card, published 1999

I am now a good halfway through the book.

Bean, has made his way to Battle School, and is flying up through the ranks as one of the more intelligent people in the School.

In fact, he is THE most intelligent person in the school, thanks to a genetic alteration, that supplies a weird twist on the story. It's also hard not to sympathize with Bean, because he doesn't really have any friends and is a constant outcast.

Luckily, Bean has gotten away from Achilles, who is one of the more creepy villains I can remember. A serial killer child? Stay away from me!

April Blog #3: Ender's Shadow, by Orson Scott Card, published 1999

Whereas Ender's Game took Ender to Battle School as quickly as possible, Ender's Shadow focuses a lot more on developing Bean's early life, to great effect. It could just be that I'm a sucker for the Ender books, but they truly are awesome.

As of now Bean is living on the streets, doing his best to survive. It quickly becomes apparent that Bean is much, much smarter than your average street urchin. In fact, he has taught himself to read, at the age of four. Yea.

I look forward to reading into Bean's perspective on the Battle Schools isolation of Ender, and how Bean ends up being one of Ender's greatest allies.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

April Blog #2: Ender's Shadow, by Orson Scott Card, published 1999

Ender's game is a tough act to follow. It is quite simply one of the best books I have ever read, so it's sequels (Speaker For the Dead, Xenocide, Children of the Mind) were all rather disappointing. So it is with some skepticism that I picked up Ender's Shadow, a 'parallel novel' to Ender's game.

Part of me screams 'Sellout!', but I also am interested to learn more about Bean, the protagonist of the book. Ender's Game was all about Ender, but there were some cool characters. I'd like to learn more about a few of them, particularly Dink, he was really cool.

So let's pick this thing up and read it!

Monday, April 27, 2009

April Blog #1: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (an autobiography), originally published 1997, newest version (w/ afterword) published 2005

Upon completing the book, it is apparent why this is a book that is read in class rooms and talked about world wide. And that is not necessarily a good thing.

The book is filled to the brim with straight up, semi sophisticated language, the kind of language that makes critics go bonkers (in a good way). Unfortunately, that sort of style does not always sit well with me and it made this book dry.

Another one of my issues with this book is the lack of flow, which is especially apparent in the first few chapters. Douglass kind of just randomly puts his thoughts down, which gives it a lack of soul reserved for your average documentary. One chapter he's talking about slave songs, the next one is about random slaves getting treated poorly. It's less an autobiography and more a first hand account of slavery.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

March Blog #8: Brisingr, Christopher Paolini, published 2008

Thank everything the book is over.

Honestly, Brisingr is simply not good. At all. It is a boring, repetitive, predictable story. Take Star Wars, throw some Lord of the Rings on top, and you've basically got the books story. Some of the characters are interesting, but then again Paolini also has a habit of introducing random characters and dropping them immediately.

The conclusion to the book is one of the most disappointing aspects of it. It ends with a stereotypical humongous battle, but that's not even the worst of it. A certain character from the previous book is rushed in within the final 50 pages, then he is dropped, and introduced again for some of the final pages, only to die over the course of about a paragraph. Mixed with Paolini's incredibly over descriptive style, this doesn't make for an appealing story.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

March Blog #7: Brisingr, Christopher Paolini, published 2008

Brisingr is an odd book. The first time I read it, I was constantly finding fault with it, yet it was incredibly difficult to put down. I zoomed by it's 800 pages in 3 or 4 days. That's quite a few pages a day!

I am finding upon my second read through that it is simply too hard to read. The chapters where it takes the perspective of a dragon are absolutely ridiculous. The speaker takes on this dumb sounding voice with far too many adjectives, naming things along the lines of "brown-fur-good-meat deer" and "burns-real-bad fire" (I made that last one up).

The story also has some pacing issues, I've hit the 450 page area and it is just sooo slow, to the point of insanity. I suppose I'll have to suck it up and keep reading, but this is just plain difficult.

Monday, March 30, 2009

March Blog #6: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (an autobiography), originally published 1997, newest version (w/ afterword) published 2005

I like the book alright so far, I just have trouble appreciating the way Douglass writes. It can be difficult to follow some times. Of course, it is a classic for a reason. I can appreciate how this book can be as followed as it is. It truly is something else to read first hand from a slave's experiences.

I think possibly the biggest issue with the book is, though it may have been truly momentous at the time, as of now the concept has been done to death in various works of arts, both of fiction and fact, be they poem, song, film, story, hymn, or full fledged novel.

So, yeah, as awesome as the book may have been a hundred and a half years ago, it kind of loses some of the effect in the translation, no?

Sunday, March 29, 2009

March Blog #5: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (an autobiography), originally published 1997, newest version (w/ afterword) published 2005

Frederick Douglass uses a choppy style of dialect with a somewhat sophisticated undertone. He doesn't drop humongous words, but he doesn't litter his chapters with "ain't" and the like. By choppy I mean he uses a lot of periods, and doesn't use many compound or complex sentences. He also tends to use a lot of descriptions involving something relative to something else, and this often requires a bit of prior knowledge. Like so...

Frederick Douglass is a very smart man. He is an author with a strange style, but I don't know if I adore it much. His book is somewhere in between Lamb and the Bartimeaus trilogy for me. I'm more into fantasy and science fiction, so this book isn't really my style. He was obviously very intelligent, though, and I respect him for writing this book.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

March Blog #4: "The Machine Stops," by E.M. Forrster, published 1909

The Machine Stops is as relevant today as it was 100 years ago. At the risk of sounding a bit cliche, this is an epic of mountainous proportions. It is something special, and it has inspired countless science fiction titles.

I was truly amazed when I finished this short story. It is something special indeed. The themes resonate within me as I explore the dark and foreboding future painted in this story. Machines taking over the human race? No, it couldn't be!

Alright, enough with this sensationalized voice. Yes, I enjoyed the story a lot. The only problem it left for me was I wanted to figure out exactly what had become of the humans on the surface.

But I suppose that is one of the questions meant to be left unanswered. We don't really know where humanity is going.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

March Blog #3: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (an autobiography), originally published 1997, newest version (w/ afterword) published 2005

"I was born in Tuckahoe, near Hillsborough, and about twelve miles from Easton, Talbot county, Maryland."

Reading this sentence out loud generates memories of the first time I saw Forrest Gump. No, the sentence itself is not stupid or uncoordinated, it simply brings back memories when I read it out loud. In fact, when you realize this sentence is coming from the mouth of a slave, it has a poignancy that can be difficult to define. And perhaps that is part of what the first sentence is about. Many slaves probably had no idea where they were or how to put it to words, and, as the back of the book says, a slave learning to read or write is punishable by death. I think that is perhaps one of the most moving aspects of the first lines. I get a feeling that Douglass is experiencing a sort of triumph and a sense of pride. He knows exactly where he is, and he can write it down, and there is absolutely nothing anyone can do about it. I process an image of a man struggling to write those first words to a story (as I so often do), and when he finally puts those words down, he is calm, and he is proud.

The first chapter of the book explains Douglass's origins as a slave, and exactly how innocent he was, how little he knew about what he was supposed to be. It is towards the end of the chapter that he sees the whippings unfold and realizes what his life is, and concludes the chapter claiming that so much more bad is to come. This sets a dire mood that pulls you into reading more.

The second chapter explains his master's life and the general activity of the slaves in more detail. It finishes up mentioning how the songs he sang as a child did not really convey the sadness that they felt, but actually probably enforced their image as barbarians.

Though I find the writing style of the book a little dry, the voice and life behind the book are captivating, and generate great feelings of awe and despair. The book is raw beauty in descriptions of the feelings, and the complacency with which he monitors and describes the scenes surrounding almost makes me feel sorry for the guy, while at the same time I feel I should feel proud of our nations current state in at the very least allowing other races to go further, if not far enough.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

March Blog #2: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

I just completed the book.

And it was an interesting book. It started off as one of the more entertaining books I've read, and the idea for the story is absolutely fantastic.

But, and this became more and more apparent as I read, it simply does not live up to it's potential. It's funny, sure, and gripping, at times, but I have this nagging feeling that if it was split into a trilogy, where the first book focused on his early life, the second book on his training as a monk and what not, and the third the conclusion of the story of Jesus, then it would have been so much better. Moore proves that he is a talented author, and the end of the book (with Josh nailed to a cross) could have been so much more emotionally stirring. His description of the Yeti can be so heartbreaking, and I feel he could have turned the ending into so much more.

Anyway, I guess that's just my two cents.

Monday, March 2, 2009

March Blog #1: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

Current page: 402

The gang is currently rounding up Josh's followers and preaching to all the various places.

As entertaining as the book can be, it seems to be in a constant rush. It's almost as if Moore had a deadline he needed to meet, and it's showing. Whereas the beginning of the book was nicely paced and entertaining to read, towards the middle it began to pick up and it continues to accelerate, and unfortunately that detracts from the story.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Feb Blog #6: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

Current Page: 337

The gang has welcomed the addition of Bartholomew, the village idiot, as one of their own as Joshua tries to learn the idea of public speaking from his psycho step brother.

The book is starting to find some focus, which is nice. I have a general idea of what may or may not happen, even though the book constantly throws surprises at you (such as the pet elephant). Often times, I find myself pitying Josh for his burden, but Moore does a good job of making you be amazed by him at the same time.

Feb Blog #5: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

Current page: 287

The pair has moved on to the next part of their journey in India, saving various children from the sacrificial hands of crazed Brahman zealots.

I'm beginning to wonder where the story is going. Sure, the book is still plenty entertaining, but it's beginning to get a bit rushed. Also, plenty bits of story are still left unanswered. Hopefully, things will be explained, as I'm sure Moore will, for he is a talented author.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Feb Blog #4: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

Current Page: 259

As of now, Josh and Biff have completed the second stage of their training with Gaspar, practicing and perfecting the arts of kung fu and "Jew-do."

Well, the book certainly hasn't gotten any worse. Moore continues to impress, and the book never stops making me chuckle. Catch the demon is quite funny, which makes me want to read Moore's book Practical Demon Keeping, which I believe is centered around Catch. I also would like to know what's going to happen when they return... Read on, I suppose...

Monday, February 16, 2009

Feb Blog #3: Lamb, by Christopher Moore, published 2002

Current Page: 111

Currently in Lamb, a resurrected Biff is contemplating learning the language of hip-hop as he continues to write the vulgar story of Jesus's childhood. Biff and J.C. have just set out to find the Magi, who they hope can help discover Jesus's role as Messiah.

Moore's story is nothing short of incredible so far. He is somehow able to be incredibly vulgar while delicately avoiding any huge offense to Christianity, Judaism, or religion in general. Jesus is still a sinless person, it's Biff who commits the various naughty crimes scattered throughout the book. Moore manages to make you think with his various religious references, tug at your heart with a failing love story we all can relate to, and all the while, you can barely keep a straight face.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Feb Blog #2: The Hobbit

Having just finished the Hobbit, I'm still amazed at the world Tolkien has managed to throw together, and the storyline of the Hobbit is still one of the coolest around.

The characters seamlessly meld together in fantastic ways, and the Hobbit sets up the Lord of the Rings perfectly, even if accidently.

Feb Blog #1: The Hobbit

Yes, I've already read this book, but I decided to pick it up because I haven't read it in a long time and, simply put, it's great, much better than "The Lord of the Rings."

Anywho, this is a fairy tale of sorts that follows the adventures of a certain Bilbo Baggins. Bilbo is a hobbit, which is essentially a very small man. As of now, I'm on page 132, and Bilbo is currently exchanging riddles in the dark with Gollum, who is known for cranking up the creep factor.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Shadow of the Giant (independent reading)#4

I have just completed the book, and it ended in classic Ender fashion (no pun intended). Though the rest of the book wasn't particularly great (some of the characters were, but if they're from Battleschool or related to Ender, they should be), the last chapter was something else.

It has been mentioned in other books that Peter is sort of the "bad side" of Ender. But he most certainly came around towards the end of the book. And the monumental (no pun intended. If you read the book, you'd understand) final lines are plenty to remember the book by.

Shadow of the Giant (independent reading)#3

I'm on page 273 now.

Peter is now slowly gaining control of the world. Which is interesting, considering he's pretty much a villain in the earlier books. Now it's being revealed as some sort of childish pride. Peter's quickly becoming a favorite.

Shadow of the Giant (independent reading) #2

I'm on page 189 now.

Orson Scott Card is a very smart man, so it will be interesting seeing where he takes the storyline now. The plot is thickening, the entire world is at war, pretty much, and Peter is using Bean's superior intellect (along with his own) to try and bring the world together, while still promising Bean that they will find his children.

Shadow of the Giant (independent reading)

I'm kind of confused on exactly how this works, but I get the idea I'm just supposed to post about my reading? Well, here it goes I suppose.

Shadow of the Giant is the 4th book in the Ender's Game universe from Bean's point of view.

As of now, Bean is looking for his children, who have been spread across the planet by now deceased Achilles. I must say, it's a shame to not have Achilles in the mix here, he's one of my favorite villains in any book.